Bright v. Mao

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 5545

Syllabus

The timing of the clerk of court's docketing of appellant's two motions for make-up parenting time did not violate due process. The trial court did not err in interpreting pertinent parenting-time orders before resolving appellant's request for make-up parenting time. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for Civ.R. 60(A) and (B) relief from its entry clarifying the parties' mid-week parenting schedule. The trial court did not violate appellant's substantive due process rights by declining to award her compensatory parenting time. Judgment affirmed.