Brigham v. Welch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that parents must comply with every requirement of court order and that subsection (O) does not allow for consideration of excuses for non-compliance
• emphasizing that par ents must comply with every requirement of court order and that subsection (0) does not allow for consideration of excuses for non-compliance
• holding evidence was legally and factually sufficient to support termination of father's parental rights under section 161.001(1)(O) based on his failure to comply with all twelve of the specific actions listed in the trial court's order
• holding evidence was legally and factually sufficient to support termination of father’s parental rights under section 161.001(1)(O) based on his failure to comply with all twelve of the specific actions listed in the trial court’s order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).