Brigham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judgment and sentence must be final before posteonviction review is proper
• concluding that the trial court erred by dismissing the amended motion for postconviction relief as untimely where the order dismissing the original motion granted leave to amend, but did not specify a deadline
• observing that Rule 3.850 “require[s] that the judgment and sentence be final before the motion is filed”
• observing that Rule 3.850\require[s] that the judgment and sentence be final before the motion is filed\
• observing that Rule 3.850 “require[s] that the judgment and sentence be final before the motion is filed”
• “Implicit in [Rule 3.850] is the requirement that the judgment and sentence be final before the motion is filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Derrell J. Chamblee v. State of Florida
  Eleventh Circuit· 2018-09-28· cited 51×
• Haber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-01· cited 5×
• Woods v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-22· cited 5×
• Armstrong v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-17· cited 3×
• Camon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-30· cited 2×
• Bradley A. Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-07· cited 1×
• Cati v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-11
• Willie C. Ford Jr. v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-31

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jumper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-25· cited 7×
• Mingo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-13· cited 5×
• Mendes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-04· cited 5×
• Smallwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-16· cited 4×