Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 9/28/1993
Brigham v. Brigham
Citations
- 863 S.W.2d 761
- 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 3139
- 1993 WL 376759
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The fact that [m]other left town without telling anyone of her exact whereabouts ... is not evidence of significant impairment to the children.... The fact that [mother] was not available for telephone calls ... is not evidence that placement with [her] would emotionally impair the children.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Thomas and Barber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beck v. WalkerTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-01-31· cited 104×
- Ganesan v. VallabhaneniTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-04-18· cited 103×
- In the Interest of SSJ-JTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-11-24· cited 103×
- In the Interest of M.W.Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1997-06-30· cited 98×
- Kirby v. ChapmanTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 1996-04-11· cited 67×
- In re Interest of J.J.G.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-08-15· cited 44×
- R____ S____ v. B____ J____ J____Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-08-17· cited 20×
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. BurnettTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1998-05-29· cited 13×
- R_ S v. B_ J_ JCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-08-17· cited 2×
- Apparajan Ganesan v. Sudha VallabhaneniTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-03-21
- in the Interest of J.J.G., L.K.G., H.A.G., and A.G.G v. Department of Family and Protective ServicesTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2016-08-04
- in the Interest of A.B.O. and E.B.O., ChildrenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-09
- in the Interest of L.D.J. III, A.Y.J., W.F.J., and C.J., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-07-21
- Johannes B. Massar v. Pegasus Pain Management, PLLCTex. App. Ct., 15th Dist.· 2025-12-01
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court· 1986-02-12· cited 4,555×
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1986-04-02· cited 2,766×
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1983-05-11· cited 1,865×
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1981-06-30· cited 962×
- Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court· 1970-03-04· cited 405×
- Lewelling v. LewellingTexas Supreme Court· 1990-10-10· cited 393×
- Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court· 1980-11-05· cited 293×
- Clancy v. Zale Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-02-19· cited 282×
- Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court· 1979-12-12· cited 115×
- Jacobs v. Danny Darby Real Estate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1988-05-18· cited 42×
- Sosa v. City of Balch SpringsTexas Supreme Court· 1989-06-07· cited 39×
- Exxon Corp. v. TidwellTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-07-29· cited 22×
- Landry v. NaulsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-11· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.