Skip to main content
· 7/1/1892

Briggs v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

Citations

  • 111 Mo. 168
  • 20 S.W. 32
  • 1892 Mo. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding trial court’s discretionary decision to dismiss legal malpractice action when plaintiff failed to disclose prior to discovery deadline summary of expert testimony establishing causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maofarlane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.