Briggs v. Salcines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if documents are privileged in the hands of the client, they retain that privilege when given to an attorney for the purpose of seeking legal advice
• holding that certiorari is available where the order from which review is sought is a departure from the essential requirements of the law and will cause irreparable harm which cannot be remedied on appeal
• observing that a nonparty has no adequate remedy for harm caused by an erroneous discovery order on appeal from a final judgment because he or she is not a party to the proceeding in which the final judgment will be entered
• observing that a non-party has no adequate remedy for harm caused by an erroneous discovery order on appeal from a final judgment because he or she is not a party to the proceeding in which the final judgment will be entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).