· 10/30/2023
Briggs v. Department of Services for Children, Youth and Their Families/Division of Family Services
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “popular vote totals in the last election are a proper measure of public support”
- observing that Buckley left unresolved whether exacting scrutiny or some \less searching standard\ applies to claims that a public financing system's qualification criteria discriminate against certain candidates
- observing that Buckley left unresolved whether exacting scrutiny or some “less searching standard” applies to claims that a public financing system’s qualification criteria discriminate against certain candidates
- matching funds impose “a substantial burden on the exercise of First Amendment rights” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- matching funds impose “a substantial burden on the exercise of First Amendment rights” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- affirming the validity of a state’s interest in not funding “hopeless” candidates through a public campaign funding system
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffiths J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.