Skip to main content
· 10/30/2023

Briggs v. Department of Services for Children, Youth and Their Families/Division of Family Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “popular vote totals in the last election are a proper measure of public support”
  • observing that Buckley left unresolved whether exacting scrutiny or some \less searching standard\ applies to claims that a public financing system's qualification criteria discriminate against certain candidates
  • observing that Buckley left unresolved whether exacting scrutiny or some “less searching standard” applies to claims that a public financing system’s qualification criteria discriminate against certain candidates
  • matching funds impose “a substantial burden on the exercise of First Amendment rights” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • matching funds impose “a substantial burden on the exercise of First Amendment rights” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • affirming the validity of a state’s interest in not funding “hopeless” candidates through a public campaign funding system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffiths J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.