Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 3/22/1999
Briggs v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 429 Mass. 241
- 707 N.E.2d 355
- 1999 Mass. LEXIS 125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, in interpreting regulations, our analysis requires substantial deference to expertise and statutory interpretation of agency charged with \primary responsibility\ for administering statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dental Service of Mass., Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-04-13· cited 178×
- Goldberg v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-07-12· cited 70×
- Atlanticare Medical Center v. Commissioner of the Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-03-20· cited 30×
- Blecker v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-07-12· cited 19×
- Olmstead v. Department of Telecommunications & CableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-12-04· cited 14×
- Board of Appeals v. Housing Appeals CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-06-10· cited 11×
- Athol Memorial Hospital v. Commissioner of the Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-08-06· cited 9×
- New England Power Generators Association, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-09-04· cited 6×
- Cuticchia v. Town of AndoverMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-04-03
- Atlanticare Medical Center v. Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2020-07-21
- Kuczinski v. GlinieckiMassachusetts Superior Court· 2011-12-20
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 2,564×
- Loving v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 415×
- Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 235×
- Rainwater v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-26· cited 226×
- South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux TribeSupreme Court· 1998-01-26· cited 205×
- Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-05-10· cited 180×
- Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1964-04-16· cited 104×
- Harvard Law School Coalition for Civil Rights v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-07-09· cited 89×
- Rehabilitation Ass'n of Virginia, Inc. v. KozlowskiFourth Circuit· 1994-12-05· cited 76×
- Pennsylvania Medical Society v. SniderThird Circuit· 1994-07-20· cited 56×
- Berrios v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-01-09· cited 51×
- Gateley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-06-03· cited 46×
- Casey v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-08-23· cited 44×
- Beverly Community Hospital Ass'n v. BelsheNinth Circuit· 1997-12-02· cited 37×
- New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation v. Cesar A. PeralesSecond Circuit· 1992-02-03· cited 36×
- Dameron Physicians Medical Group, Inc. v. ShalalaN.D. California· 1997-02-25· cited 7×
- McCreary v. OffnerDistrict of Columbia· 1998-03-31· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.