Briggs v. City of Palmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court “may relax procedural requirements for pro se litigants” in some situations
• holding it was reversible error to rule that, in a condemnation case, a landowner \could not testify about damages based on the value of his property before and after [an] alleged taking\ because of his lack of \expertise in property valuation\
• relaxing appeal deadline for appellant who filed repeated post-trial motions that did not “me[e]t the requirements to toll the running of time for filing an appeal” but who was “a pro se litigant who seems to have misunderstood court procedure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).