Briggs v. Carol Cars, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding car salesman liable under G. L. c. 93A, § 9, where misrepresentation of fact was reckless, though in nature of opinion
• upholding application of sections 2 and 9 of chapter 93A where defendant made “reckless” misrepresentations
• the statute comprehends acts done with a reckless disregard for whether one’s acts are unfair or deceptive
• interest on multiple damages portion of § 85 awards accrue only from date of judgment
• purchase of car that required considerable repair work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).