Briggman v. Virginia, Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state child support agency was immune, under the Eleventh Amendment, from plaintiff’s civil rights action
• applying the Rooker – Feldman doctrine and abstaining from adjudicating a prior state court decision as to child support
• explaining the plaintiff’s federal law claims were barred by the Younger abstention doctrine to the extent he was involved in state court proceedings for non-payment of child support
• claim seeking court review of state court child support order barred by Rooker-Feldman doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).