Bridgewater v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no new sentencing hearing is required, nor need the defendant be present in court for the merely clerical or ministerial function of entering a written order conforming to the oral pronouncement of the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cargle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-18· cited 13×
• V.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-19· cited 6×
• Farmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-01· cited 5×
• Culliver v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-27· cited 3×
• McBride v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-09· cited 1×
• VB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-19

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-14· cited 13×
• Nation v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-20· cited 8×
• Gilmore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-05· cited 2×