Bridget Rashaw v. United Consumers Credit Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s dismissal of MMPA claims against credit union because such claims were barred by the express exemption of § 407.020.2(2)
• rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that it was permitted to bring an action under Section 407.025 against an entity exempt under Section 407.020.2; stating, “[t]he contention that one provision of the MMPA completely negates another violates well-accepted principles of statutory construction”
• “[W]e agree that these claims clearly accrued when plaintiffs received the allegedly facially deficient collateral disposition notices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).