Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party seeking discovery must make a “particularized showing” that “the information sought is essential to a fair resolution of the lawsuit”
• holding that a party seeking discovery must make a \particularized showing\ that \the information sought is essential to a fair resolution of the lawsuit\
• finding that “it is not enough that a trade secret might be useful” to the party seeking discovery
• finding that \it is not enough that a trade secret might be useful\ to the party seeking discovery
• finding that the tire expert did not “describe with any precision how or why the formulas were a predicate to his ability to reach conclusions in the case”
• finding that the tire expert did not \describe with any precision how or why the formulas were a predicate to his ability to reach conclusions in the case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).