Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Lockhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding scope of activity covered by noncompetition clause unreasonable because it extended to “any business ... similar to ... any portion” of a multi-industry corporation as compared to the single industry division for which employee worked
• “A claim of trade secret misappropriation should not act as an ex post facto covenant not to compete.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).