S.D. Indiana· 5/7/1998
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Lockhart
Citations
- 5 F. Supp. 2d 667
- 1998 WL 234526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding scope of activity covered by noncompetition clause unreasonable because it extended to “any business ... similar to ... any portion” of a multi-industry corporation as compared to the single industry division for which employee worked
- “A claim of trade secret misappropriation should not act as an ex post facto covenant not to compete.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-09-12· cited 146×
- Burk v. Heritage Food Service Equipment, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-24· cited 48×
- Loparex, LLC v. MPI Release Technologies, LLCIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-03-21· cited 35×
- Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc.S.D. Florida· 2001-05-24· cited 28×
- Interbake Foods, L.L.C. v. TomasielloN.D. Iowa· 2006-11-13· cited 24×
- Standard Register Co. v. CleaverN.D. Indiana· 1998-10-14· cited 15×
- Product Action International, Inc. v. MeroS.D. Indiana· 2003-08-05· cited 13×
- Butts v. Oce-USA, Inc.S.D. Indiana· 1998-06-05· cited 8×
- Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. MichelsonS.D. Texas· 1999-03-25· cited 6×
- Bodemer v. Swanel Beverage, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 2012-07-31· cited 6×
- Harlan Laboratories, Inc. v. CampbellD. Massachusetts· 2012-10-25· cited 4×
- Kentner v. Timothy R. Downey Ins., Inc.S.D. Indiana· 2006-03-29· cited 1×
- International Action Center v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2009-11-17
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-03-26· cited 233×
- Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1995-05-11· cited 171×
- Bright v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court· 1866-11-15· cited 99×
- Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court· 1955-06-20· cited 95×
- Amoco Production Co. v. LairdIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 91×
- Dortch v. LugarIndiana Supreme Court· 1971-01-26· cited 85×
- Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 73×
- Seach v. Richards, Dieterle & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-08-31· cited 68×
- AMP Inc. v. FleischhackerSeventh Circuit· 1987-07-16· cited 60×
- Harvest Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Inter-Ocean Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-05-15· cited 56×
- Ackerman v. Kimball International, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1995-07-12· cited 44×
- Orbison v. WELSH, GOVERNORIndiana Supreme Court· 1962-01-22· cited 40×
- Slisz v. Munzenreider Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-10-29· cited 37×
- Jak Productions, Incorporated, an Indiana Corporation v. Edward J. Wiza, IIISeventh Circuit· 1993-02-16· cited 36×
- Furno v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-05-06· cited 33×
- Hahn v. Drees, Perugini & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-11-21· cited 31×
- Smart Corp. v. GriderIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-05-19· cited 26×
- Kozuch v. CRA-MAR Video Center, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-05-22· cited 26×
- Ackerman v. Kimball International, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-05-23· cited 23×
- Kroger Food Stores, Inc. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-09-09· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.