Bridges v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no confidential communication involved in attorney’s testimony that he did not see alleged absent witness in court at previous trial, thus no violation of the privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Manning v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1989-02-21· cited 21×
• Castle v. Richards
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1959-11-27· cited 4×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fritts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1931-06-03· cited 14×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1935-03-20· cited 8×