Bridges v. Gilbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the prisoner’s speech was not inconsistent with legitimate penological interests
• “Even though some of these allegations would likely not be actionable in and of themselves, if the acts were taken in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutionally protected right, then they are actionable under § 1983.”
• listing the elements of a retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).