Bridges v. Bridges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an award of the maximum amount of child support under the guidelines, despite the fact that the father's income exceeded the uppermost limit of the guidelines, in consideration of the totality of the obligations owed by the father
• affirming an award of the maximum amount of child support under the guidelines, despite the fact that the father's income exceeded the uppermost limit of the guidelines, in consideration of the totality of the obligations owed by the father

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• TenEyck v. TenEyck
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2003-10-10· cited 66×
• McGowin v. McGOWIN IV
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-02-29· cited 13×
• Thompson v. Thompson
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-10-21· cited 3×
• Simera v. Simera
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1993-12-10· cited 2×
• Stuart v. Stuart
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-06-13· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trammell v. Trammell
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-09-27· cited 20×
• Ex Parte McCracken
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-01-11· cited 16×
• Cook v. Cook
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-02-15· cited 13×
• Cox v. Cox
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1986-02-05· cited 13×
• Cox v. Cox
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-11-22· cited 9×
• Bridges v. Bridges
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1992-03-06· cited 7×