Skip to main content
· 12/2/2005

Bridgers v. Dretke

Citations

  • 431 F.3d 853
  • 2005 WL 3256498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the split among federal circuit courts as to whether Miranda warnings must explicitly provide that a suspect is entitled to the presence of counsel during an interrogation
  • describing split among federal circuit courts as to whether Miranda warnings must explicitly provide that a suspect is entitled to the presence of counsel during an interrogation
  • recognizing a circuit split on this issue
  • \[A] suspect must be explicitly warned that he has the right to counsel during interrogation.\
  • “[A] suspect must be explicitly warned that he has the right to counsel during interrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Benavides, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.