Bridge v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to dismiss § 1681 s–2(b) claim because plaintiff had “not alleged compliance with the statutory notice requirements”
• “[T]he case law for the most part seems to hold that, although there exists no federal question jurisdiction for TCPA claims, there does exist diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.”
• “Since the TCPA does not contain an express limitations period, [the] [plaintiff]’s claims fall under the federal four-year “catch-all” statute of limitations found at 28 U.S.C. § 1658.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).