Bridge Metal Industries, L.L.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the law was unclear “based on the existence of applicable case law that rendered uncertain whether the term... would be deemed unambiguous”
• collecting cases and holding that insurer’s duty to defend for advertising injury liability was triggered by potential claims of trade dress infringement
• finding, in the context of the Lanham Act, that “despite the allegations of intentional conduct by [the] [p]laintiffs, [the] complaints asserted covered causes of action for which [the] [p]laintiffs could have been found liable without any intentional conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).