· 6/9/1976
Bridegroom v. State Bar
Citations
- 550 P.2d 1089
- 27 Ariz. App. 47
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the Bar as ‘an administrative arm’ of the Supreme Court
- \This constitutional provision does not prohibit the State Bar from expending money itself in the proper exercise of its authorized activities.\
- approved bar association’s use of dues to advocate passage of a state constitutional amendment
- supreme court has inherent power to regulate Arizona bar
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krucker, Howard, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.