Skip to main content
· 6/9/1976

Bridegroom v. State Bar

Citations

  • 550 P.2d 1089
  • 27 Ariz. App. 47
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the Bar as ‘an administrative arm’ of the Supreme Court
  • \This constitutional provision does not prohibit the State Bar from expending money itself in the proper exercise of its authorized activities.\
  • approved bar association’s use of dues to advocate passage of a state constitutional amendment
  • supreme court has inherent power to regulate Arizona bar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krucker, Howard, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.