Bridas Corp. v. Unocal Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court possessed jurisdiction to issue anti-injunction relief following perfection of appeal because the trial court’s order did not undermine or interfere with appellate court jurisdiction or modify the final judgment
• holding that trial court possessed jurisdiction to issue anti-injunction relief following perfection of appeal because the trial court's order did not undermine or interfere with appellate court jurisdiction or modify the final judgment
• holding that trial court possessed jurisdiction to issue anti-injunction relief following perfection of appeal because the trial court’s order did not undermine or interfere with appellate court jurisdiction or modify the final judgment
• affirming anti-suit injunction when proof clearly showed intent to disregard the jurisdiction of the court and circumvent its final judgment
• evidence existed showing that res judicata defense may not be available or provide adequate relief in foreign jurisdiction of Afghanistan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).