Brickey v. Bowen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sample size of 28 “counsel[ed] against heavily weighting statistical evidence.”
• finding that, where deponent had opportunity to address relevant issue during deposition, later declaration testimony directly contradicting deposition testimony would not be considered in opposing summary judgment
• finding that where deponent had opportunity to address relevant issue during deposition, later declaration testimony directly contradicting deposition testimony would not be considered in opposing summary judgment
• finding nine-month gap between internal complaint and RIF “outside the time frame traditionally considered to allow for an inference of causation.”
• finding a sample size of 28 people too small to infer any discrimination
• “The extensive discovery already taken is likely sufficient to enable [the p]laintiffs’ NYCHRL claims to be evaluated in state court without any additional discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).