Bricker v. R & a PIZZA, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting Domino’s motion to dismiss harassment and retaliation claims because there was no allegation that Domino’s was the employer of the employees of the franchisee
• dismissing complaint that contained only a sole conclusory statement that one party was the agent of the moving party
• stating “[g]enerally, a franchisor is not the employer of employees of the franchisee”
• “[T]he existence of a franchisor-franchisee relationship between persons does not in itself preclude the existence of a principal-agent relationship between them.”
• “[T]he existence of a franchisor-franchisee relationship between persons does not in itself preclude the existence of a principal-agent relationship between them.”
• “[T]he existence of a franchisor-franchisee relationship between persons does not in itself preclude the existence of a principal-agent relationship between them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).