· 7/21/2006
Bricker v. Martin
Citations
- 348 B.R. 28
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53703
- 2006 WL 2054354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, unlike normal abstention situations, section 1334(c)(1) grants bankruptcy courts “broad discretion” to determine whether to abstain from determining a claim
- concluding that this factor weighs in favor of abstention where there is no federal question or diversity jurisdiction for a dispute
- “The. pertinent caselaw demonstrates that bankruptcy courts have considerable discretion to decide whether to abstain under section' 1334(c)(1).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardiman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.