Skip to main content
· 7/21/2006

Bricker v. Martin

Citations

  • 348 B.R. 28
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53703
  • 2006 WL 2054354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, unlike normal abstention situations, section 1334(c)(1) grants bankruptcy courts “broad discretion” to determine whether to abstain from determining a claim
  • concluding that this factor weighs in favor of abstention where there is no federal question or diversity jurisdiction for a dispute
  • “The. pertinent caselaw demonstrates that bankruptcy courts have considerable discretion to decide whether to abstain under section' 1334(c)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.