Brichacek v. Hiskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Des Moines, Iowa, Municipal Code provision that required a “wofking lock” lacked the requisite specificity for negligence -per se
• holding Des Moines, Iowa, Municipal Code provision that required a “working lock” lacked the requisite specificity for negligence per se
• holding Des Moines, Iowa, Municipal Code provision that required a “working lock” lacked the requisite specificity for negligence per se
• assuming “as fact an unstated finding that is necessary to support the [court’s] judgment”
• “When no motion to enlarge or amend was made, we assume as fact an unstated finding that is necessary to support the judgment.”
• “we assume as fact an unstated finding that is necessary to support the judgment” when district court failed to make requisite findings of fact and no rule 179(b) motion was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).