Briarwood Capital v. Lennar Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding government speech where the City of Al- pharetta, Georgia and the sponsor of a parade “came together to endorse the same message”
• discussing how the “[c]ity publicly advertised and pro- moted the 2019 [p]arade on its website” when analyzing whether the city endorsed the parade
• “For the [plaintiffs] to prevail in this civil-rights action, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, they must show that they were ‘deprived of a federal right by a person acting under color of state law.’”
• “The history of military parades in general, and this [p]arade in particular, weighs in favor of finding that the USCA11 Case: 21-11298 Date Filed: 09/30/2022 Page: 34 of 40 34 Opinion of the Court 21-11298 [p]arade was government speech.”
• “The government-speech doctrine does not require omnipotence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).