Brian Shawn Gilley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that competency “may be revisited throughout the entire trial” and noting 34 that appellant did not ask the trial court to revisit its determination at any time, even after the witness testified in front of the jury
• “Appellant contends that by excluding him and his counsel from the in-camera competency hearing, the trial court violated his rights to attend a critical stage of the proceedings, confront a witness against him, and have the assistance of counsel in the process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).