Brian S. Leib v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the district court erred in focusing exclusively on whether there was continuity of ownership or control in determining whether Georgia-Pacific was a successor in interest under the veterans’ reemployment rights statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).