Skip to main content
· 6/15/1993

Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International Development

Citations

  • 994 F.2d 874
  • 301 U.S. App. D.C. 327
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 152
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13768
  • 1993 WL 198435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts “do [ ] not need to provide detailed guidance to pro se litigants.”
  • noting that a pro se litigant should be permitted to amend his complaint to meet pleading requirements prior to dismissal so long as the defendant is not prejudiced
  • commenting that \leave to amend is particularly appropriate when a plaintiff proceeds pro se\
  • “Pro se litigants are allowed more latitude than litigants represented by counsel to correct defects in service of process and pleadings.”
  • “Pro se litigants are allowed more latitude than litigants represented by counsel to correct defects in service of process and pleadings.”
  • district court “should supply [pro se party] minimal notice of the consequences of not complying with procedural rules”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Ginsburg, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.