Brian Matthew Nash v. Commissioner of Public Safety

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “as a simple panel, we are bound by prior precedent” to adhere to the per se ban (emphasis added)
• holding that there was no good cause to raise an untimely suppression motion when the defendant could have with due diligence discovered the information necessary to raise the issue
• holding that good cause typically exists when a defendant does not know the basis for the motion until after the time for such a motion had expired
• holding that no good cause was present to raise an untimely suppression issue where the defendant could have with due diligence discovered the information necessary to raise the issue
• holding that there existed no good cause to raise an untimely suppression issue where the defendant could have with due diligence discovered the information necessary to raise the issue
• holding filing of motion in limine sufficiently preserves issue for appeal once court denies motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).