· 7/5/2018
BRIAN KABLITZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although “[t]he need for grand jury secrecy is reduced after the grand jury has concluded its work,” “courts still must consider the possible effect upon the functioning of future grand juries”
- “The constitutional text confirms that a Senate impeachment trial is a judicial proceeding.”
- “The courts cannot tell the House how to conduct its impeachment investigation or what lines of inquiry to pursue, or how to prosecute its case before the Senate, much less dictate how the Senate conducts an impeachment trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.