Brian Isaacson v. Penn Community Services, Inc., Brian Isaacson v. Penn Community Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was not an employee despite payment of a “subsistence salary”
• considering whether “the principal purpose of the seemingly employment relationship was to benefit the person in the employee status”
• “Particularly in the case of ... hospitals, museums and schools, the role of the volunteer is not unknown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).