Skip to main content
· 4/19/2024

Brian Hora and Gregg Hora, Individually and on behalf of Hora Farms, Inc., and Precision Partners Corp. v. Keith Hora and Kurt Hora, Individually and in their capacity as Shareholders, Directors, Officers, Managers, and Employees of Hora Farms, Inc., Heather Hora, and HK Farms, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accepting the plaintiff’s argument that if an “employee is awarded back pay, accompanied by equitable remedies (i.e. full back pay with seniority and benefits, or a ‘make whole’ remedy
  • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 4311 et seq.
  • “Because a plaintiff’s factual allegations must be taken as true for purposes of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a plaintiff may survive merely by having alleged that the FMLA violation was willful.”
  • “The determination of whether an employee meets the FMLA’s eligibility requirements is made in reference to the date the employee commences his or her leave, not the day the employer takes an adverse action against the employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.