Brian Dubrin v. People of the State of Califor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing pro se habeas 27 petition as challenge to sentence currently being served where such sentence had 28 been enhanced by an expired prior conviction, the validity of which petitioner 1 challenged.
• courts should permit a pro se prisoner to amend the petition to name the custodian as the proper respondent
• state courts incorrectly dismissed petitioner’s state habeas petitions on ground that he was no longer in 22 custody although petitioner was still on parole and therefore still in custody
• petitioner should be granted leave to amend 12 petition to name proper respondent
• petitioner should be granted leave to amend petition to name proper respondent
• petitioner should be granted leave to amend petition to name proper respondent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).