Brian Boquist v. Peter Courtney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying activity analysis and concluding statute of repose applies to design professionals who supplied exterior wall panel but does not apply to suppliers who provided stock windows
• discussing warranty for fitness of a particular purpose, §2-315; and warranty of merchantability, §2-314
• discussing applicability of § 2B to suppliers of mass produced construction materials, as distinct from custom designed building components, to a claim under G. L. c. 93 A based on a breach of an implied warranty of merchantability
• discussing statute of limitations applying to a breach of implied warranty
• distinguishing, for purposes of statute of repose, between “mere suppliers of standardized products,” on the one hand, and those who perform “acts of ‘individual expertise’ akin to those commonly thought to be performed by architects and contractors,” on the other
• statute of repose applies to G. L. c. 93A claims that are \tort-like in nature\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).