Brian Anthony Preciado v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the warrants at issue satisfied the particularity requirement because when read as a whole, they limited officers’ search to evidence related to aggravated burglary
• recognizing good-faith exception may allow prosecutors to use evidence obtained under impermissibly general categories of search warrant
• “A warrant that empowers police to search for something satisfies the particularity requirement if its text constrains the search to evidence of a specific crime.”
• “A warrant that empowers police to search for something satisfies the particularity requirement if its text constrains the search to evidence of a specific crime.”
• “[Warrants] need not meet the rigors of Roget, Merriam, Webster, Strunk, and White. A commonsense contextual reading usually suffices, and usually gets the point the magistrate and officer sought to express.”
• warrant provided probable cause to search cell phone for evidence of burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).