BRIAN AND KRISTINA PUGLIA v. ROSEMARIA PHILLIPS (L-0945-16, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sovereign immunity bars a defendant from joining the state as an apportionment defendant under § 52-102 and § 52-572h .
• holding that sovereign immunity barred the inclusion of the apportionment defendant for the purpose of apportionment
• holding that sovereign immunity bars a defendant from joining the state as an apportionment defendant under § 52-102 and § 52-572h .
• ‘‘The legislature has established a system for the determination of claims against the state. . . . A significant part of that system is the appointment of a [C]laims [C]ommissioner . . . who is vested with sole authority to authorize suit against the state.’’ (Citations omitted.)
• ‘The legislature has established a system for the determina- tion of claims against the state. . . . A significant part of that system is the appointment of a claims commis- sioner . . . who is vested with sole authority to autho- rize suit against the state.’ . . .

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).