Brewster v. Lathrop
Citations
- 15 Cal. 21
Syllabus
<p>Plaintiff assigns to defendant, September 22d, two shares of stock in a mining company, stating in the assignment, “I authorize the transfer to him, (defendant) with all the dividends made after the morning of the twenty-third of September.” Both parties expected a dividend on Monday, the twenty-second. The trustees did not, in fact, declare dividends until between noon and one o’clock, on Tuesday. Held, that the dividends belonged to plaintiff; and that parol evidence was admissible to explain the transaction, and point its meaning.</p>
Judges: Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.