Brewster District Unit v. Monroe

Citations

• 117 Wash. 21
• 200 P. 841
• 1921 Wash. LEXIS 1008

Syllabus

<p>Contracts (4) — Mutuality. A contract whereby one party agrees to haul and warehouse fruit grown by the other party is void for lack of mutuality, where the grower is not by its terms bound to deliver any given quantity of fruit.</p> <p>Evidence (168) — Parol to Vary Writing — Prior or Contemporaneous Agreements. Where a written contract for the hauling and storage of fruit is void for want of mutuality, oral evidence is inadmissible to show that an agreement was made, at or before the time of the writing, that the grower bound himself to deliver all the fruit of the crop for a given year.</p>