Brewington v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence was sufficient to convict defendant as party to kidnapping when defendant followed kidnapper and victim in another car
• “Not all of the elements under the Garza test must favor the [S]tate to prove asportation.”
• “Not all of the elements under the Garza test must favor the [S]tate to prove asportation.”
• evidence was sufficient to convict defendant as party to kidnapping when defendant followed kidnapper and victim in another car
• evidence was sufficient to establish kidnapping where defendant got inside the victim’s truck, pointed a gun at him, and forced him to drive to a location of the defendant’s choosing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).