Brewer v. Erwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that logic dictates that a court has jurisdiction to clarify one of its opinions
• an appellate court, as incident to its appellate jurisdiction, has such inherent powers as are necessary to enable it effectually to exercise its jurisdiction
• an appellate court, as incident to its appellate jurisdiction, has such inherent powers as are necessary to enable it effectually to exercise its jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hunt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 48×
• Brewer v. Erwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-09-20· cited 5×
• State v. Ventris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-31· cited 3×
• Roseburg Investments, LLC v. House of Fabrics, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-08· cited 2×
• John W. Brown Properties v. Blaine County
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-05-27· cited 2×
• Averill v. Red Lion
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-12· cited 1×
• Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. Hudspeth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-01· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1951-03-07· cited 62×
• Huston v. Trans-Mark Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-04-14· cited 18×
• Null v. Siegrist
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-06-01· cited 14×
• Rexnord, Inc. v. Ferris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-07-11· cited 5×
• Johnson v. Campbell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-05-24· cited 5×
• Brewer v. Erwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-02-16· cited 3×