Skip to main content
· 5/14/1900

Brew v. Hastings

Citations

  • 196 Pa. 222
  • 46 A. 257
  • 1900 Pa. LEXIS 507

Syllabus

<p>Partnership — Continuance of firm after death of member — Dissolution.</p> <p>Stipulations in articles of copartnership for the continuance of the firm after the death of a member, and until the consent of all the partners is given to a dissolution, are valid and binding, and on the death of an individual partner will prevent a dissolution.</p> <p>It is not a fraud, actual or constructive, upon creditors 'for a debtor to enter into a partnership agreement in a banking business for the term of ten years with a stipulation that the death of a member during that period should not work a dissolution, but that his interest should remain in the partnership, his representatives, however, to have no voice or control in the management.</p> <p>Partn ership — Disso lution — Findings of fact.</p> <p>It is error for the court to find as a fact a parol agreement between the surviving partners and representatives of a deceased partner for a dissolution of the partnership, where the evidence discloses merely propositions from both sides for settlement not acceded to by either, and no conclusion reached.</p>

Judges: Brown, Collum, Dean, Green, Mestrezat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.