Breuninger v. Lightbown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court abused its discretion in applying ORS 426.095(1
• concluding that the trial court abused its discretion in applying ORS 426.095(1) when it held a civil commitment hearing at the courthouse but required the allegedly mentally ill person to appear remotely, with- out any apparent reason for not transporting him to the courthouse
• explaining that, in applying ORS 426.095(1), “[n]o rea- son was given why transporting appellant to the courthouse or making some other accommodation would have been inconvenient for the court”
• one test for evaluating whether a court has abused its discretion is whether the decision was clearly against reason and evidence
• one test for evaluating whether a court has abused its discretion is whether the decision was clearly against reason and evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).