Breuer v. Dowden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting Rule 12(c) ineligibility motion in spite of failure to include ineligibility in invalidity contentions because “the Court could have reached the issue presented by [the] motion before discovery even began”
• finding the defendant had not waived § 101 invalidity challenge by failing to include it in its responses to plaintiffs interrogatories because the Northern District of Georgia’s Local Patent Rule 4.3 did not require such disclosure
• “The legal standard for assessing a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as the standard for a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).”
• “The legal standard for assessing a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as the standard for a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).”
• “The legal standard for assessing a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as the standard for a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).