Skip to main content
· 2/27/1998

Brett v. Berkowitz

Citations

  • 706 A.2d 509
  • 1998 Del. LEXIS 84
  • 1998 WL 99834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an out-of-state expert must demonstrate that he has familiarized himself with the local standard of care
  • holding plaintiff may not bring private cause of action under the criminal statute criminalizing sexual harassment
  • explaining that “Rule 404(b) allows for the admissibility of ‘other wrongs or acts’ in civil cases only for purposes other than to show propensity”
  • discussing scope of discovery where privilege is raised to defend against production
  • “Mere repetition of sexual behavior is not evidence of a plan or scheme . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Hartnett, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.