Skip to main content

Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. Shaw

Citations

  • 72 A.D.3d 258
  • 893 N.Y.S.2d 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that res judicata barred a malpractice claim based on legal services considered in a prior claim for fees, litigated and awarded, for the alleged-negligent services
  • holding that res judicata barred a malpractice claim based on legal services considered in a prior claim for fees, litigated and awarded, for the alleged-negligent services
  • holding that 6 res judicata barred a malpractice claim based on legal services considered in a prior 7 claim for fees, litigated and awarded, for the alleged-negligent services
  • noting that collateral estoppel applies “whether or not the . . . causes of action are the same”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. Shaw

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.