Skip to main content
· 10/14/1988

Brennen v. Mogul Corp.

Citations

  • 557 A.2d 870
  • 151 Vt. 91
  • 1988 Vt. LEXIS 237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that bald argument, left unsupported with legal authority, was inadequately briefed
  • concluding that bald argument, left unsupported with legal authority, was inadequately briefed
  • \Plaintiff-wife's claim for loss of consortium is a derivative action and depends on the success of her husband's tort claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Barney, Keyser, Costello, Martin, Supr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.