Brennan v. Fatata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is implicit in § 2679(b) that if the defendants do not turn over their suit papers or if the Attorney General does not certify that they were acting within the scope of their employment, the state action continues against the defendants personally
• “It is implicit in the statute that if the defendants do not turn over their suit papers or if the Attorney General does not certify to their being in the scope of Federal employment, the State action continues against the defendants personally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Helen D. Kelley and John E. Kelley v. United States of America, Ruth Semko
  Second Circuit· 1978-01-03· cited 66×
• Shirley McLaurin Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs of Milton Stubbs, Deceased v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-12-02· cited 19×
• Jones v. Littlejohn
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-08-15· cited 12×
• Combs v. United States
  E.D. Kentucky· 1991-06-04· cited 10×
• Tassin v. Neneman
  D. Kansas· 1991-06-03· cited 4×
• McLaurin v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-12-21
• Fiocca v. Kirschner
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-05-16